Dated:9 April 2016

Dear readers of Australia Wake Up, this newsletter is in two parts, the first is a letter to a parish priest who is awakening to the threat of ISIS but is not quite there yet. The second part is the recent press release from ISIS clarifying their position as doctrinaire Muslims. In this they are accurately following the footsteps of Mohammed and the legions of Jihadists who for 1400 years have blighted the lives of the rest of those sectors of humanity they could harm in the name of their Allah.

The purpose is to give you further insight on how we must push to wake people up who have started to 'think the unthinkable'. We need to help them to 'speak the unspeakable' and then to 'do the unimaginable' - which is to act to save their own civilization, culture and families in the face of clear and present danger.

The best words to clear up the meaning of Islam are given to us by the Jihadists. They are open about their goals. It is only a few cowardly Western leaders who twist the words of Islam. But then they are habituated to twisting everything aren't they!

Greetings from the Australia wake Up team; David, Harry, David, Brendan and Chris.

PART 1: Letter to a good-hearted priest after his daring sermon castigated ISIS as if its behavior was exceptional to Islam.

The sermon was given to a Catholic Sunday service and covered the incident of Thomas the disciple who wanted personally to see the proof of Jesus' resurrection and wounds before he could believe. The priest, Father Joseph considered that Thomas sincerely desired to know the truth rather than to take the words of others. He exemplified the way of taking personal responsibility for belief rather than passively going along with others.

Father Joseph contrasted Thomas's example of practical faith with the absoluteness of ISIS as religious extremists who could permit no doubt in their ranks and who would crush anyone who got in their way. He considered that the ISIS example demonstrated how not to practice religious faith, so they could be condemned for their brutal practices.

Father Joseph's audience was a suburban congregation of about 150 people of mixed nationalities in a city parish. He is known for being outspoken and is a keen student of history.

Read on.

Dear Father Joseph,

Your declaration about ISIS as a fanatical absolutist group during the Sunday Sermon was most helpful for many people. (I particularly appreciated your take on Thomas and his 'reasonable doubt'- I concur with your perspective). You have my full support in teaching the people about these misunderstood matters which are mostly beyond the ken of the average churchgoer. However there is more to your take on ISIS than the orthodox Christian perspective. There is the historical and Islamic evidence to consider.

I realize that it takes time to wake people up and to bring them with you on the educational journey about Islam.  What follows is not directed at you but rather expresses my wish that the Christian Church would wake up from its willful self-deception and ignorance about these times and the dangers to our children. I am happy to provide reliable resources to anyone you may know who wishes to learn the truth about Islam.

...So here goes - and hold on to your hat!

The attached document is the textual justification from ISIS on its Brussels and Paris activities. The undeniable point here is that ISIS is presenting front and centre the ORTHODOX interpretation of Islam. They are completely following the example and teaching of Mohammed the perfect Muslim and his god Allah's directions - just as St Francis faithfully followed that of Jesus Christ the perfect example for Christians.

Through their statement the Muslims of ISIS are declaring to all Muslims and to non-Muslims (who they refer to as "the Kufar"), how everyone is expected to comply unconditionally with the scriptural instructions laid down in the Qur'an and Sira and Hadith. ISIS is more Muslim than the 'moderate Muslims' in the same way that practicing Catholics are more Catholic than the non-practicing/lip-service ones. A moderate Muslim (whom Islam refers to as a "hypocrite") cannot belong to ISIS because the Islamic standard is so cleary defined.

So while I applaud your honesty and directness at informing the parishioners about the evils of ISIS, there is much more to this matter. We must accept in our minds and hearts that we cannot separate the earnest and faithful adherence of ISIS to the Prophet Mohammed's example, to Allah's commands and to the traditions of Islam. That means that we cannot separate ISIS from Muslims and Islam, in fact ISIS represents the truest, most clear and pure form of Islam in words and deed.

As Kufar (non-believers) we are in no position to dictate how to interpret the Qur'an to ISIS, nor to interpret Islam to the non-Muslims, as if we know the Islamic meaning better than ISIS. There is only one interpretation of Islam and that is found in the Qur'an, Hadith and Sura - not in the mouths of us unbelievers.
There is no basis for any of us to tell ISIS that they misunderstand Islam. That is simply wishful thinking.

For us to accept the less militaristic Muslims as if they are the 'true Muslims' and are most in compliance with their scriptures (which consist only of the example of Mohammed, and Allah's commands therein to guide them and supporting commentaries) is to seriously deceive ourselves. Islam is the problem. It is Islam that is at the root of this horrid Jihad business. The Qur'an forbids the practice of so-called 'moderate' Islam, unless it advances the cause through subterfuge, as I am sure you must realize from the attached quotes.

So we cannot separate ISIS from Muslims, from Islam, from Muhammed or from Allah.

I have attached several 'memes' to illustrate the point about the Qur'an. We have 1400 years of evidence of Jihad and over 230,000,000 people killed and documented to prove the point. (
Ref. 'Islamic Jihad, A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery' by M.A. Khan 2009) All of Islam whatever its degree of fanaticism is based on the same texts and core ideas.

As a student of history I am sure Father Joseph that you must know that Islam is coming for us all. Fifty six nations, the bulk of them previously Christian have fallen to Islamic Jihad and ISIS-type forces since Mohammed died in 632 AD. Who is next?

The Church seems willing to submit to Islam with nary a whimper.

Who is willing to wage the Counter-Jihad? In my opinion we now have no option but to resist its advances, since some deluded people have welcomed the agents of Islam into Australia and New Zealand. And greater fools want to bring more of its sick culture in to our country within the souls of so-called 'refugees'.

Today's Jihadist is tomorrow's 'refugee'. Tomorrow's refugee is the next day's Jihadist. That is the lesson of Brussels, France, Germany and everywhere else where they have been 'welcomed' by the socialists and soft-headed Christians. Once the Muslims arrive the Jihad starts all over again in the new setting.

That act of bringing the Islamic fire into our house is an act of treason against the people of Australia and New Zealand, against our Christian heritage and an act of unfaithfulness to the Body of Christ.

Thank you for reading my little "diatribe".

Best wishes,
Chris Newman

P.S. Whenever ISIS mention 'unbeliever' or Kafir' the meaning is "Australia" or 'New Zealander' or you and me and our people.



Bottom of Form

READ: Official ISIS Announcement on Brussels Attacks

Published 11:54 am EDT, March 22, 2016 Updated 10:11 pm EDT, March 22, 2016 37 Comments By Sam Prince 


The Islamic State has officially claimed credit for the suicide bombing and bomb attacks today at Zaventem airport and Maelbeek metro station in Brussels, Belgium. The statement released today also further touched on the Paris attacks, claimed by ISIS in November.

Three explosions, at least one reportedly perpetrated by a suicide bomber, ripped through Brussels, Belgium late this morning at Zaventem airport and Maelbeek metro station. The attacks in Belgium began today around 7 a.m.

The number of dead has since been updated to 31.

The attacks come after "Paris attack mastermind," Salah Abdeslam, was captured in the Brussels, Belgium district of Molenbeek after his fingerprints were found at the scene of a separate police raid.

Salah Abdeslam was on the run since the November attacks, French police say. His brother, Ibrahim Abdeslam, also took part in the attacks. Teams of terrorists killed at least 129 people at several locations across Paris, including the Bataclan theater, the national soccer stadium and outside of restaurants. Abdeslam is widely thought to have developed, coordinated, and carried out the attack with the help of the Islamic State.

Amaq News, ISIS' "official" news agency, sent these two messages out:

Brussels - Amaq Agency: Islamic State fighters carried out a series of bombings with explosive belts and devices on Tuesday, targeting an airport and a central metro station in the center of the Belgian capital Brussels, a country participating in the international coalition against the Islamic State.

Islamic State fighters opened fire inside Zaventem Airport, before several of them detonated their explosive belts, as a martyrdom bomber detonated his explosive belt in the Maalbeek metro station. The attacks resulted in more than 230 dead and wounded.

A longer, official statement by ISIS regarding today's attacks in Brussels and why they were "justified" was also sent out by Amaq News. Read that below:

Paris Attack (13th Nov. 2015) and Brussels Attack (22nd March, 2016) in the light of the Islamic Shari'ah.

Justifying the Paris attacks/Brussels attack(the likes of it) in the light of the Qur'an and sunnah and the ijma' & quotes from the scholars of the salaf.

We have seen so many people in the social media claiming that The Islamic state was not justified in killing the French "innocent" citizens in the blessed ghazwa in Paris, and that of the Brussels attack now. We have also seen some evil "scholars" - Scholars for the dollars quoting the textual evidences out of context. Today , we shall tackle this topic with evidences from the Qur'an and sunnah and the ijma' & quotes from the scholars of the salaf

First we want to make it clear to all that what makes the kafir's blood permissiable to spill is not him fighting the Muslims, rather it is his "KUFR" that necessitates his killing. So if one asks, can you kill a Kafir (who does not fight Islam and muslims)? the answer is a big YES.

Explaining the "Mafhum Al-Mukhalafah" (the understanding of the opposite) in Usul Fiqh:

This is like when Allah said: "And never pray (funeral prayer) upon any of them (i.e. the hypocrites) who dies, nor stand at his grave." (At-Tawbah verse 84). So because the disbelieving hypocrites were those whom Allah specifically identified as being prohibited to have the funeral prayer performed upon and their graves visited, then this necessitates that the Muslims are those who are to be prayed upon and whose graves are to be visited. And this is understood by the rule: "Mafhum Al-Mukhalafah" (the understanding of the opposite), because if we say the disbelievers are those whom Allah specified a prohibition regarding something, then this necessities that the opposite ruling would apply for those who are opposite to them (i.e. the believers). So this is the explanation for the rule: "Mafhum Al-Mukhalafah", which is also referred to as: "Dalil Al-Khitab".

The example of the prohibition of praying the funeral prayer for the disbeliever indicating the permissibility of praying the funeral prayer for the Muslims and visiting their graves was used by Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah frequently, as he said: "And do not ever pray upon anyone of them who dies and do not stand at their graves." Therefore, the 'Dalil Al-Khitab' is that the believers are prayed upon and their graves are to be stood at." ["Majmu' Al-Fatawa ", Vol. 3/399; also look to Vol. 24/330 & Vol. 24/346 & Vol. 27/448]

Allah says: "...But if they repent and perform As-Salat, and give Zakat, then leave their way free..." (At-Tawbah Verse 5)

NOTE: Repentance in the above ayah means saying the shahadatain and entering Islam. Ibn 'Umar narrates that the Rasulullah(saw) said: "I have been ordered to fight against the people until they testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and until they establish the Salah and pay the Zakah. And if they do so then they will have gained protection from me for their lives and property, unless [they commit acts that are punishable] in accordance to Islam, and their reckoning will be with Allah the Almighty." [Sahih Bukhari & Sahih Muslim] Therefore, the 'Dalil Al-Khitab' in the above ayah & hadeeth is that, if the kuffar don't become Muslims, their blood would not be protected and would be legal to spill and their wealth would be halal to take.

Allah also has made the blood of every kafir legal to spill in the general ayah: "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush" (At-Tawbah verse 5).

Allah just said the mushrikeen (idolators), so he never differentiated the "innocent civilians" from the "fighting soldiers". So who are we to differentiate the kuffar today?

Ijma' of the ulamaa on the legality of spilling the blood of the Kuffar:

Ibn Kathir said: "Ibn Jareer narrated an Ijma' (scholarly consensus) that it is permissiable to kill a kafir if he has no protection even if he is in Baytul Haram or Baytul Maqdis" [Tafsir Ibn Katheer 2/6]

Al Qurtubi said: "The ulamaa have gathered in consensus (ijma) that; if a kafir was to wrap his neck with his hands and the backs of all the trees in the Haram (Makkah) (in an effort to save his life); that would not prevent his killing if he had no previous contract of security" [Tafsir At-Tabari 6/61]

Quotes of the ulama' of the salaf about the legality of spilling the blood of the kuffar even if they dont fight us:

-- Imam Ash-Shafi' said: "Allah the exalted & blessed legalized (to spill) the blood and wealth of the kafir unless he pays the jizya (tax) or he is granted protection for a certain period" [Al Umm 1/264]

-- Imam Ash-Shawkani said: "As for the Kufar, their blood is basicaly legal (to spill) as it is in the ayah of the sword (At-Tawbah verse 5), what about if they start fighting(us)?" [Al Sayrul Jarar ..

-- Umar bin Al Khattab said to Abu Jandal (May Allah be pleased with them both): "For verily they are Mushrikeen (polytheits), and the blood of one of them is like the blood of a dog" [Reported by Ahmad & Al Bayhaqi]

-- Ibn Muflih said: "There is no expiation nor blood money paid for killing a kafir that has no peace treaty, because his blood is generaly permissiable (to spill) like the pig" [Al Mubdi' 8/263]

-- Ash-Shawkani said: "The kafir, whether he fights (the Muslims) or not: his blood is permissiable (to spill) as long as he is a kafir" [Al Sayrul Jarar 4/369]

-- Al Kasani: "Basicaly: Anyone (who is a kafir) from the fighters (i.e. the male that has reached the fighting age): it is permissiable to kill him whether he fights (the Muslims) or not" [Bada' As-Sanai' 7/101]

-- Al Qurtubi said: "If a Muslim meets a kafir that has no contract (of protection): it is permissiable for him to kill that Kafir" [Tafsir Al-Qurtubi 5/338]

-- As-Sarkhasi said: "There is no sin upon one who kills the appostates before calling them to Islam because they are the same with the kuffar and the Message (of Islam) has reached them" [Al Mabsut 10/120]

-- Imam An-Nawawi said: "As for the kafir that has no contract of peace (with a legitimate Islamic State to which he pays Jizya), there is no liability in killing him, from whatever religion he might be" [Rawdhatu Talibin 9/259]

-- Ibn Hajar Al 'Asqalani said: "The existence of the disbelief (Kufr) is what permits the blood" ["Fat'h Al-Bari ", Vol. 12/326; publication of "Maktabat Dar As-Salam" & "Maktabat Dar Al-Fayha' ", 1st Edition, 1418 H.]

For those that say that we mistranslate these Quranic verses of Jihad and Qitaal and we go against the 'known' 'ulamaa':

then give them this audio by Shaykh Ibn 'Utheymin who they respect a lot who says exactly what we have said now

Shaykh Ibn 'Utheymin(rh), said in a tape recording regarding this topic: "And the second (matter) is the forbiddance of killing women and children in times of war. But if it is said: 'If they (the kuffar) do this to us - meaning that they kill our children and women - Then do we then kill them?' The apparent [dhahir] is that it is (permissible) for us to kill their women and children - And due to the generality of the Statement of Allah: "Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him"{ Al-Baqarah: 194} [Refer to the side "B" from the third cassette of Kitab al-Jihad from Sharh Bulugh al-Maram. Starting at time frame 29:09]

In addition to the above cattegories of those of the kuffar that we shouldnt kill, we have :

1. The Children

2. The Women

3. The Old etc.

So All those kuffar cattegories we mentioned that their blood is protected; they can be killed anytime should they violate their contracts by:

A.) If the dhimi/Mu'ahad starts fighting the Muslims etc he is killed and his blood would be legal to spill despite him paying jizya

B.) If the kuffar kill our children/Women/old we do the same: Allah Says: "So whoever has transgressed against you, then transgress against him in the same way that he has transgressed against you" [Al Baqarah 194]

So how many Muslim women and children and old have The French Kuffar killed in Syria, Iraq and other parts of the muslim lands???? We have not yet settled the scores, a few hundreds aint enough yet.

Allah also says: "And if you punish [an enemy, O believers], punish with an equivalent of that with which you were harmed" [An-Nahl 126]

Allah Also Says: "And the retribution for an evil act is an evil one like it" [Ash-Shurah 40]

Allah also says: "And those who, when an oppressive wrong is done to them, they take revenge" [Ash-Shurah verse 39].

this was a piece of article for the one who cry and mourn on the death of the Kuffar, while the death hundreds of muslim men, women, old and children dying daily in the airstrikes don't effect them in anyway.



Find more ISIS news, photos and videos here.

'ISIS' Promises More Attacks in Europe on Twitter After Brussels Attacks

After today's attacks and suicide bombing at Zaventem airport and Maelbeek metro station in Brussels, Belgium, a French Islamic State affiliated Twitter account threatened further attacks.

Click here to read more

Online copies of this newsletter and other newsletters are available at:

(c) Copyright 2015 - Australia Wake Up